Choosing the right firearm is a deeply personal decision, and for Glock enthusiasts, the debate between the Glock 17 Gen 1 and Gen 2 often arises. While both are iconic handguns, significant differences exist in design, features, and overall shooting experience. This in-depth comparison will help you understand these distinctions and determine which generation best suits your needs.
Key Differences: A Head-to-Head Comparison
The Glock 17 Gen 1 and Gen 2, while sharing the same basic design philosophy, boast several crucial differences that impact handling, reliability, and overall performance.
1. Trigger: A Matter of Feel and Safety
- Gen 1: Features a significantly heavier, more spongy trigger pull. This can be challenging for some shooters, especially those accustomed to lighter, crisper triggers. The lack of a trigger safety is also a notable feature, a design choice that sparked considerable debate at the time of its release.
- Gen 2: Introduced a slightly improved trigger, albeit still heavier than modern Glock triggers. The most significant change was the addition of a trigger safety, enhancing safety by requiring more deliberate trigger manipulation for discharge. This modification addressed a key concern raised regarding the Gen 1's design.
2. Finger Grooves: Ergonomics and Grip
- Gen 1: Employs aggressive finger grooves molded into the grip. While these were intended to enhance grip and control, many shooters find them uncomfortable or restrictive, leading to hand fatigue during extended shooting sessions.
- Gen 2: Retains the finger grooves but offers a slightly altered design, making them less pronounced than those found on the Gen 1. This subtle adjustment improves comfort and reduces the potential for hand cramping.
3. Finish: Aesthetics and Durability
- Gen 1: Often features a matte black finish, which can be prone to wear and tear over time. This can impact the handgun's aesthetics and potentially grip.
- Gen 2: Also typically sports a matte black finish, but with improved durability and resistance to wear, compared to its predecessor.
4. Slide Serrations: Improved Handling
- Gen 1: Features relatively smaller and less aggressive slide serrations. This can make manipulating the slide during reloading or malfunction clearance more challenging.
- Gen 2: Includes more prominent and more aggressively angled slide serrations, providing a more secure and comfortable grip during slide manipulation. This improvement greatly enhances usability.
5. Availability and Cost: Market Considerations
- Gen 1: These are becoming increasingly rare, often sought after by collectors and enthusiasts of early Glock designs. Their scarcity can lead to significantly higher prices on the secondary market.
- Gen 2: While also less common than later generations, finding a Glock 17 Gen 2 is comparatively easier than a Gen 1. This naturally translates into a more accessible price range.
Which Generation Reigns Supreme?
The “better” generation ultimately hinges on individual preferences and shooting styles.
- Gen 1: Appeals to collectors and those seeking a piece of Glock history. The heavier trigger and aggressive finger grooves may suit shooters with larger hands and a preference for a more traditional feel.
- Gen 2: Offers improvements in safety (trigger safety), ergonomics (less aggressive finger grooves), and slide manipulation (larger serrations). This makes it a more versatile and user-friendly option for a broader range of shooters.
Ultimately, handling both models is highly recommended before making a decision. Consider factors such as your hand size, shooting experience, and intended use to determine which Glock 17 generation best aligns with your needs and preferences. Remember to always prioritize safe handling and responsible gun ownership practices.
