The Ruger Mark IV Competition pistol has rapidly gained a reputation as a serious contender in the world of .22 LR target shooting. But does it live up to the hype? This in-depth review dives deep into its features, performance, and overall value, providing a comprehensive assessment for both seasoned shooters and those considering their first high-end .22 LR pistol.
Design and Features: Built for Precision
The Ruger Mark IV Competition is meticulously crafted for accuracy. Its standout features include:
-
Heavy Barrel: The bull barrel significantly reduces barrel whip, leading to improved accuracy and consistency. This is crucial for competitive shooting where even minor inconsistencies can impact scores.
-
Adjustable Sights: The fully adjustable rear sight allows for precise zeroing at various distances, a vital feature for optimizing performance across different target ranges. The fiber optic front sight aids in quick target acquisition.
-
Lightweight Skeletonized Hammer: Reducing the weight of the hammer contributes to smoother cycling and less felt recoil, enhancing the overall shooting experience and potentially improving accuracy.
-
Ambidextrous Safety: The ambidextrous safety caters to both right and left-handed shooters, ensuring comfortable and intuitive operation for a wider range of users.
-
Improved Ergonomic Grip: The grip is designed for a comfortable and secure hold, minimizing hand fatigue during extended shooting sessions. This improved ergonomics is a significant upgrade compared to previous Mark series models.
-
Rugged Construction: Ruger's reputation for durable firearms is well-earned, and the Mark IV Competition is no exception. The pistol is built to withstand the rigors of frequent use and demanding competitive shooting.
Performance and Accuracy: On the Range
The Mark IV Competition's true test lies on the range. In testing, the pistol demonstrated exceptional accuracy. The heavy barrel effectively dampens recoil, resulting in tighter groups even during rapid fire. The adjustable sights allowed for easy and precise zeroing, optimizing performance across a variety of distances. The smooth trigger pull, while requiring some break-in time, contributes to consistent shot placement. This combination of accuracy and consistent performance makes it a strong contender for competitive shooters aiming for high scores.
Ammunition Considerations:
While the pistol performed admirably with a wide variety of .22 LR ammunition, optimal accuracy is achieved with high-velocity, match-grade ammunition. Experimenting with different brands and types will help shooters identify the ammunition that produces the best results for their specific pistol.
Pros and Cons: A Balanced Perspective
Pros:
- Exceptional Accuracy: The heavy barrel and adjustable sights contribute to outstanding accuracy.
- Ergonomic Design: The improved grip and ambidextrous safety make it comfortable for a wider range of shooters.
- Durable Construction: Ruger's reputation for quality is reflected in the pistol's robust build.
- Affordable High-End Option: Compared to other high-end .22 LR target pistols, the Ruger Mark IV Competition offers excellent value.
Cons:
- Trigger Pull: While smooth after a break-in period, the trigger pull might feel a little different than what some shooters are used to.
- Limited Magazine Capacity: The standard magazine capacity might be considered limited by some competitive shooters, although aftermarket options are available.
Conclusion: A Winning Choice
The Ruger Mark IV Competition delivers on its promise of precision and performance. It's a well-designed, accurate, and durable pistol perfectly suited for competitive target shooting. While it might require some adjustments in the trigger pull and magazine capacity, its affordability, accuracy, and overall features make it a top choice for both experienced and aspiring .22 LR enthusiasts. For those looking for a reliable and accurate competition pistol without breaking the bank, the Ruger Mark IV Competition is a strong contender that deserves serious consideration.
